Monday, July 31, 2006
Movie Review: King Kong
I hate being right.
The heat of the weekend found me cowering on the couch next to the air conditioner with a bowl of Peppermint Ice Cream, and a handful of movies picked out by someone else, of which, King Kong seemed a reasonable time waster. I had refused to see King Kong in the theatres for two reasons: First it is a story about a giant ape. Second, I was concerned that it would be long, CG-laden, and primarily about a giant ape.
Like I said, I hate being right.
Not to say that King Kong wasn't exciting. No no, there was adventure-a-plenty, I assure you, but...
...have you Ever gotten Bored during a Monster Fight Scene? Well watch King Kong, and then you will. Over and over.
Here is a tip (and after watching LOTR, I Never thought I would have to give Tips to Peter Jackson) - just because you have access to a top notch CG department good does Not mean that every CG scene rendered needs to be in the movie.
It seems Peter Jackson's philosophy is 'screw the pacing, the fight scene / chase scene / bug scene / Naomi Watts closeup scene takes as long as it takes!' That's a great philosophy for your first sexual encounter, but not for movies. Well, not for Good movies anyways.
I lost count of how many people died trying to save Naomi Watts, but I gotta say, she ain't worth it. I also lost count of how many times she fell down in the movie, but that was far, far, far, far, far, far, far outnumered by the number of times she stared blankly towards the camera, trying to convey some kind of emotion through telekenesis and not through facial expressions. It never did work, but they tried. Oh, how they tried. Over and over and over they tried, and then they tried some more.
Well, to be fair, sometimes she looked to the *right* of the camera and sometimes she looked to the *left* of the camera, which was a nice attempt to break up the monotony. It didn't work, but it was a nice try.
I give King Kong a 3.5 out of 10. All in all, the movie that is too big for its britches. Cut the budget in half, cut the script in half, cut the running time in half, cut Naomi Watts in half, and replace her with an actress with the ability to convey emotion, and trade King Kong for Godzilla, and then you will have a far better movie.
Oh yes, the last line of the movie? I won't spoil it for you, and I'm guessing it's from the book, but it would have been a wise choice to remove that line from the movie. That line is so dumb, that removing it could have raised my review score one whole point.
Blog on,
-CZ
11 Comments
Permalink
The heat of the weekend found me cowering on the couch next to the air conditioner with a bowl of Peppermint Ice Cream, and a handful of movies picked out by someone else, of which, King Kong seemed a reasonable time waster. I had refused to see King Kong in the theatres for two reasons: First it is a story about a giant ape. Second, I was concerned that it would be long, CG-laden, and primarily about a giant ape.
Like I said, I hate being right.
Not to say that King Kong wasn't exciting. No no, there was adventure-a-plenty, I assure you, but...
...have you Ever gotten Bored during a Monster Fight Scene? Well watch King Kong, and then you will. Over and over.
Here is a tip (and after watching LOTR, I Never thought I would have to give Tips to Peter Jackson) - just because you have access to a top notch CG department good does Not mean that every CG scene rendered needs to be in the movie.
It seems Peter Jackson's philosophy is 'screw the pacing, the fight scene / chase scene / bug scene / Naomi Watts closeup scene takes as long as it takes!' That's a great philosophy for your first sexual encounter, but not for movies. Well, not for Good movies anyways.
I lost count of how many people died trying to save Naomi Watts, but I gotta say, she ain't worth it. I also lost count of how many times she fell down in the movie, but that was far, far, far, far, far, far, far outnumered by the number of times she stared blankly towards the camera, trying to convey some kind of emotion through telekenesis and not through facial expressions. It never did work, but they tried. Oh, how they tried. Over and over and over they tried, and then they tried some more.
Well, to be fair, sometimes she looked to the *right* of the camera and sometimes she looked to the *left* of the camera, which was a nice attempt to break up the monotony. It didn't work, but it was a nice try.
I give King Kong a 3.5 out of 10. All in all, the movie that is too big for its britches. Cut the budget in half, cut the script in half, cut the running time in half, cut Naomi Watts in half, and replace her with an actress with the ability to convey emotion, and trade King Kong for Godzilla, and then you will have a far better movie.
Oh yes, the last line of the movie? I won't spoil it for you, and I'm guessing it's from the book, but it would have been a wise choice to remove that line from the movie. That line is so dumb, that removing it could have raised my review score one whole point.
Blog on,
-CZ
Labels: movie reviews
Blog Feeds
Subscribe to this Blog by E-Mail
Zero Links
Jagged Links
Search
Blog Archives
- January 2004
- February 2004
- March 2004
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008




